# Possibility of not submitting annual accounts

**URL:** <https://community.silverfin.com/t/possibility-of-not-submitting-annual-accounts/1510>\
**Category:** Templates\
**Created:** [June 19, 2019, 10:24am UTC](https://community.silverfin.com/t/possibility-of-not-submitting-annual-accounts/1510 "2019-06-19T10:24:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cedric.devos](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/90db22/32.png) [@cedric.devos](https://community.silverfin.com/u/cedric.devos)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2019, 10:24am UTC](https://community.silverfin.com/t/possibility-of-not-submitting-annual-accounts/1510/1 "2019-06-19T10:24:04Z")

</div>

Hi,

A few months ago we created our own template ‘WCO Checklist’.  
Now a few users are asking if it’s possible to not allow the submission of the annual accounts (the download of the xbrl file) when a checkbox (custom.checkbox.review) in this template is not checked.  
This checkbox must be checked when the WCO Checklist was completely reviewed by the person responsible for this. This because of safety regulations imposed by the institute for accountants & tax consultants.

Is that possible to do this?

Kind regards,  
Cedric

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sven](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/user_avatar/community.silverfin.com/sven/32/1495_2.png) [@sven](https://community.silverfin.com/u/sven)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2019, 11:30am UTC](https://community.silverfin.com/t/possibility-of-not-submitting-annual-accounts/1510/2 "2019-06-19T11:30:52Z")

</div>

Hey @cedric.devos,

So what you’re actually looking for, is to restrict the options shown in this section right?  
 ![22](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/uploads/getsilverfin/original/2X/a/a014cfbb2cfa0484ed9f068b6606f1a775e6489b.png)

currently not possible but have heard it before, and it is listed as a feature request.

PS sort of a workaround, but you could add an additional check that forces an Annual Account template into being unreconciled.  
This will cause the workflow becoming different from 100%, and as most users will known, you cannot download a XBRL file if your workflow isn’t finished yet.

A similar case was described here:

> [@CASE: add extra check to reconcile template](https://community.silverfin.com/t/case-add-extra-check-to-reconcile-template/1415):
>
> It happens that some templates are reconciled as soon as data is filled in, no matter what is filled in. For instance, a template that features all directors with some additional info: But I’d rather have someone check this info again, as I’m not able to built in extra logic. Take the field name and first name: you cannot built in logic if the data there is correct or not. In cases like this, I’d like to have my template be unreconciled to someone has to do an extra check on it, to rec…

Perhaps too big of a workaround, but hope it helps you though (you’ll need to do some tweaking to teh code obviously, and link it to the check of the WCO template)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sven](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/user_avatar/community.silverfin.com/sven/32/1495_2.png) [@sven](https://community.silverfin.com/u/sven)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2019, 3:13pm UTC](https://community.silverfin.com/t/possibility-of-not-submitting-annual-accounts/1510/3 "2019-06-19T15:13:29Z")

</div>

Closed on June 19, 2019, 3:13pm UTC